Omnes nationes servitutem ferre possunt: nostra civitas non potest.
("All races are able to bear enslavement, but our community cannot.")
From this we can draw the first use of the word nationes, which would evolve through Old French to become the word nation by it's first, modern use in respect of the Byzantine emperor in 968AD.
The land...which you say belongs to your empire belongs, as the nationality and language of the people proves, to the kingdom of Italy. - Liutprand of Cremona
Cicero makes clear the difference between the nationes
and the civitas which he regards as the body of the Empire. Sovereign states based on the model of nationhood - division by religious or racial boundaries (as we can read from Cicero) only begin to appear after the Roman Empire and are only referred to in these terms by the late 17th century.
The Roman Empire can't be considered an empire on parallel terms to the British Empire or any other 'empires' of the period of nations. The Roman Empire was the totality of civilisation, representing the first unified civitas of multiple nationes. Following empires simply reclaimed other nation areas, imposing their own civic rule upon them.
Nationalism died as deciding force with then end of the Second World War. The Cold War was fought on ideology regardless of nationhood and race and it follows naturally that in an age of multiculturalism, globalisation and the Internet that borders of the kind laid out after the disintegration of the Roman Empire are outdated and irrelevant memorials to the brief period of nationalism that gripped the world from the medieval period to the beginning of the Cold War.